< Previous Section | Home | Next Section > |

So far we have dealt with exceedingly small and exceedingly large quantities. But they were finite nevertheless. We could think of numbers even larger or smaller than the largest or smallest we dealt with and pretend that they measure something.

In
answering Exercise 1.1.2 (“How far
away is 1?”), you found that the distance from the *x*-axis
to 1 was more than $10^{30}$ times the distance on your screen from the
*x*-axis to $6\cdot 10^{-64}$,
or about 1 billion trillion billion trips across
the visible universe. This is an impossibly large physical distance. But
we can imagine it, and talk about it. Here is a wonderful __YouTube
video__ that
addresses this very issue of unimaginably large and small numbers in the
human experience.

In another module we will find situations where we need to talk about rates of change over intervals of a quantity’s measure that are “infinitely small”, or about accumulations of change over a number of intervals, where the number becomes “infinitely large”. The phrases “infinitely small” and “infinitely large” have been controversial in the history of mathematics. We will not ask you to address that controversy. Instead, we will ask you to form a personal image that will, in practice, serve the purpose that is intended by appealing to “infinitely small” and “infinitely large” quantities. We will speak about intervals that are small enough so that, were they any smaller, it would make no essential difference relative to the problem being addressed.

If
you must have a definite length to consider as “infinitely small”, then
think of the __Planck
Length__. The Planck Length is the smallest length
that, theoretically, can be measured. It is approximately $1.6 \cdot
10^{-35}$ meters. For practical purposes, you can think of the Planck
Length on a number line in place of the phrase “infinitely small”. You
can also think of $6.5 \cdot 10^{34}$
meters, the reciprocal of the Planck Length, in place of
“infinitely large”.